home
***
CD-ROM
|
disk
|
FTP
|
other
***
search
/
TIME: Almanac 1995
/
TIME Almanac 1995.iso
/
time
/
062590
/
0625410.000
< prev
next >
Wrap
Text File
|
1994-03-25
|
2KB
|
58 lines
<text id=90TT1664>
<title>
June 25, 1990: Con Game
</title>
<history>
TIME--The Weekly Newsmagazine--1990
June 25, 1990 Who Gives A Hoot?
</history>
<article>
<source>Time Magazine</source>
<hdr>
THEATER, Page 77
Con Game
</hdr>
<body>
<qt>
<l>SIX DEGREES OF SEPARATION</l>
<l>by John Guare</l>
</qt>
<p> Like his most famous play, The House of Blue Leaves, John
Guare's wry new off-Broadway work concerns the almost mystical
longing of the unfamous for contact with celebrities. The odd
title derives from a theory that any two people, no matter how
distant in geography or circumstance, are linked by a chain of
acquaintances: A knows B, who knows C, and so on. Thus the most
renowned figure will turn out to be a friend of a friend of a
friend. When a well-spoken young black man bursts into a
Manhattan millionaire couple's home, bleeding from an apparent
mugging and claiming to be both a Harvard chum of their
children and the son of Sidney Poitier, the startled Wasp hosts
believe him. They accept even his screwiest assertion, that
he can get them bit parts in a film of Cats to be directed by
his father, because they, like most victims of confidence
tricks, are blinded by vanity.
</p>
<p> The story, based on an actual incident, takes on deep
resonances in Guare's fiction. It becomes a metaphor for
liberals' fantasies of rescuing the poor. It confronts the
ambivalence that the sane feel toward the mentally ill: when
the con man, deftly played by James McDaniel, seems to reveal
a pathological belief in his own fantasies, the wife, played
by the ever splendid Stockard Channing, vacillates between
compassion and revulsion. And the encounter devastatingly
sketches the uneasy state of U.S. race relations, in which white
liberals may endorse the black cause in theory, yet not know
any blacks socially and thus fawn on or patronize them. When
the intruder starts to analyze The Catcher in the Rye in
scholarly jargon, the hosts are spellbound by his vocabulary
and miss the fact that his rap becomes comic nonsense.
</p>
<p>By William A. Henry III.
</p>
</body>
</article>
</text>